| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
>I could pull a spare server out of the production
>grid for testing HVM under 2.6.30 if needed.
As far as to my knowledge Xen 3.4-rc3-pre Dom0 & (2.6.30-rc3-tip)
support only PV DomUs. HVM is still unsolved problem.
If i am wrong about that, please advise.
Boris.
--- On Tue, 4/28/09, William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: William Pitcock <nenolod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git branch reorg
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 3:13 AM
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 16:48 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> William Pitcock
wrote:
> > Yeah, it's working here now. Thanks for that.
> >
> > We intend to start testing the 3.4 release candidate with 2.6.30
> > paravirt-ops dom0 in our test environment this weekend.
> >
>
> OK, that'll be interesting. What's your test environment?
Paravirtualization-only nocona-based (early EM64T) Xeon hardware, with
nodes comprising of dual 2.8ghz CPUs with 8GB of memory, on Debian
testing.
Production is presently at 3.2 with XenLinux 2.6.18 patches rebased
against 2.6.26. Production machines are dual opteron 2216 machines with
8GB-16GB of RAM, with both HVM and Paravirtualized domains.
The test and production grids use the same storage backend, which is
presently provided through exporting LVM volumes with AoE and
cluster-lvm.
I could pull a spare server out of the production grid for testing HVM
under 2.6.30 if
needed.
William
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home