 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] the latest dom0 tree
| To: | Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] the latest dom0 tree |
| From: | M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:28:58 +0100 (BST) |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:29:41 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401D184852A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401D184852A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Alpine 2.00 (GSO 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Hi, Jeremy, when I check the latest dom0 tree, seems the latest changeset is still in March 29 as shown below. As I'm new to git, so I want to confirm I didn't make anything wrong, and there is no changes after that? And also, all pv_dom0 work should base on xen/dom0/hackery branch, am I right? xen/dom0/hackery was left behind a bit during the attempt to get dom0 into 2.6.30 during the merge window. Alternate branches to use are push2/xen/dom0/master and xen-tip/next . I believe the plan is that xen-tip/next will become the branch to use, but not all the patches from the other branches have been copied across yet.
Michael Young
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] MSI-X interrupts to guests, Jiang, Yunhong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: fix next->vcpu_dirty_cpumask checking in context_switch(), Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] the latest dom0 tree, Jiang, Yunhong |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] the latest dom0 tree, Jiang, Yunhong |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
