Re: [Xen-devel] Xen console question.

To:	Chuck Short <zulcss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Xen console question.
From:	Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:17:57 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:18:22 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<27c823430901121755j7c1fc259he016adb866187bc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Chuck Short's message of "Mon\, 12 Jan 2009 20\:55\:01 -0500")
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<27c823430901121755j7c1fc259he016adb866187bc0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)

Chuck Short <zulcss@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I was playing around with the 2.6.18 kernel source and I was wondering
> if its possible to make the tty the default so I dont have to pass any
> additional parameters. I was thinking of using add_preferred_console
> or something like that. If anyone has any ideas please let me know.
>
>
> Thanks
> chuck

May I suggest to play with the pvops kernel instead?  I think we
solved the problem there (commit 9e124fe1).

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen console question.