WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:01:42 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:02:03 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C5A37F16.1BF4%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acl/xfRBkJKnJktJZ0mYMPoY9oAMngAEc6T+
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] page ref/type count overflows
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024
On 26/01/2009 14:54, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> The count_info one only, or are you also intending to change _domain?
>> With struct page_info pretty large already, I'd want to avoid growing it
>> needlessly.
> 
> I'm going to change both and do it the easy way, growing the structure from
> 40 to 48 bytes. You can shrink it again with the tricks you describe if
> you're keen. I'm not sure how ugly the list stuff would end up, which would
> be my main concern, but I suppose you can hide it behind list.h-style
> macros. I don't see there's much duplication of effort to phase the work
> like this.

By the way, unless you can see some really clever way to shrink page_info to
32 bytes then I think it is only worth doing compression tricks on the
list_head field, to save 8 bytes (struct becomes 40 bytes). Compressing the
domain field won't get you down to another multiple-of-eight size. It may be
a trick to keep in mind for future though...

And all my stuff is in, as of changeset 19093.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel