 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Xen c/s 18943
| To: | "Xiaohui Xin" <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Xen c/s 18943 |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:48:36 +0000 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:48:23 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
I'm having the impression that this change is incomplete: Shouldn't the checks close to the beginning of p2m_set_entry() and guest_physmap_mark_populate_on_demand() also be constrained to AMD? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] RE: Xen c/s 18943, Xin, Xiaohui |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Problem with starting guest (para_virt dom0), Adam Wendt |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] RE: Xen c/s 18943, Xin, Xiaohui |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
