WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 30 of 38] xen: implement io_apic_ops

To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 30 of 38] xen: implement io_apic_ops
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:38:06 -0800
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:38:55 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20081120192218.GF3955@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <patchbomb.1226603398@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <d103c0da2fa147ac31af.1226603428@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081120093506.GB6885@xxxxxxx> <492597B9.8070506@xxxxxxxx> <20081120192218.GF3955@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081009)
Ingo Molnar wrote:
it certainly looks thin enough to me although i'm really not sure we want to virtualize at the IO-APIC level. Peter, what's your opinion/preference?

Given that Xen's requirements here are pretty Xen-specific (I don't imagine that any other virtualization system would work in the same way), I didn't bother trying to come up with a general "virtualization" layer at this level - that's why I was pretty blunt about putting xen_* calls in without any indirection. But the code could certainly be restructured in a way which would make it simpler to hook Xen as a side-effect, so long as it was achieving some other goal as well (general cleanup, big iron architecture support, better msi handling, whatever...).

   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>