| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: About pit irq
On 19/11/08 08:22, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I see. Yes, a slower tick is better since maximum overflow for
> pit ch2 is about 54ms, and xen has already be a tickless
> model.
Most systems will have ACPI PM or HPET timer though, right? Does PIT
platform timer inefficiency matter? Hacking on it more is a pain.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home