WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] MCA support for Intel64

Hi,

Thank you for your comment and information.
But, I wonder where to start about these issues.

> BTW, I checked you patch to kernel of mce-xen.c, seems not much change to it. 
> You will add more changes on it, right?

Yes, I plan to implement memory offlining, if the impacted physical
memory is detected by MCA, it will be offlined and never reused. Then
Xen notifies it to Dom0/DomU. Dom0/DomU's handler should kill such
a process or do something.

Thanks,
KAZ


From: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] MCA support for Intel64
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:35:55 +0800

> Glad to know you are working on MCA too.
> There are some discussion already on it, I google and get the link 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/56284 for some 
> discussion. You can check that thread.
> 
> Some point need discussion including:
> 1) How to detect the impacted components in Xen side? As the above mail 
> thread discussed, maybe some improvement can be added to check the context 
> more precisely. For example, if the stack tell the MCE happens when Xen is 
> running, even if current is idle, we still think Xen is impacted. Also we can 
> check the page owner to decide impacted guest. Personally I don't think 
> "current" is very helpful.
> 2) How to split the effort between Xen and Dom0? Maybe we can re-use dom0's 
> MCE handler as much as possible, Xen will only do some initial containment, 
> especially considering Linux is also enhancing MCE handler. Of course, 
> another option is to place all handler in Xen side.
> 3) We need consider what will happen if multiple MCA happen at multiple CPU 
> simuatanously, maybe some monarch algrithom is needed.
> 
> Hope your input on it.
> 
> BTW, I checked you patch to kernel of mce-xen.c, seems not much change to it. 
> You will add more changes on it, right?
> 
> Thanks
> Yunhong Jiang
> 
> xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am interested in MCA/MCE on x86 system. But I don't have AMD
> > machine, so I tried to port MCA handler on AMD k8 to Intel p4, I
> > attach it. Additionally, I attach a patch that supports MCA handler for
> > linux-2.6.18-xen/x86_64.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't know how to test MCA/MCE on Intel p4 CPU and
> > chipset, so I could not test with real MCA only in testing with fake
> > mode(just function calling). Is there anyone who knows and teaches me how
> > to test the real MCA?
> >
> > [1/2] xen part: mca-support-for-intel-xen.patch
> > [2/2] linux/x86_64 part: mca-support-for-intel-linux.patch
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kazuhiro Suzuki <kaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > KAZ
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>