WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7 of 7] x86: always explicitly map acpi memory

To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7 of 7] x86: always explicitly map acpi memory
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 17:14:51 -0700
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:15:12 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=PpRedII4pb3Yxcyuqaobe147bPtO6ZTp8w66FxEDXmU=; b=Diwmh1I0Fb6txCxq6qaU0SbVTVlCtKPMah6GyCkpqo4gBHw0oEJBCOnX+f/R326x+7 2R5+g8xGFhEFEX/zwBMQF+rBjKn4R2OogYX0QH9rQ9lZ+pw7d56DCmF2upeW/vbTJjG/ +hIjGQA+34G/8Yu6jBd8n1oI3IamKTeunK1w8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=BDHJlDhgdQQEXs+5akgjAPfeBHGwK1RcvhlkRjvq0EcZXoxDE2RjrXEJBG8Jc/ETTi WqHsH1PTSlu7c/CaU2LkibilrCcbQ8IJuQhZ3xzEL+At/QxVXLxxLze3JooHD0sInBWj Y1J5313yFUlN2C2gEqKtVHfbolowh5RQ1lxDw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <48C46B83.70704@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <patchbomb.1220826072@localhost> <6f23bad119ae2ed00f1c.1220826079@localhost> <86802c440809071635l1457659bufeefa6e65cc34bdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48C46B83.70704@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> actually,
>> case 1: acpi tables near mmio, range, we don't map them from
>> 2.6.27-rc1, and it is bigger than max_low_mapped...
>> case 2: some strange system put acpi in the middle of RAM... like when
>> 8G ram installed, but MMIO is 3.5G, BIOS put acpi tables around 2G..
>>
>
> OK, so what's your conclusion?  Is this change OK or not?
>

Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>