| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/13] xen: pv domain builder.
Gerd Hoffmann writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/13] xen: pv
domain builder."):
> 02 -> 04 Make sense if you want to *test* the patches without merging
> with upstream qemu before. For *merging* the patches I'd
> suggest to merge from upstream qemu instead, then wait for
> me rebasing the patchset (and dropping these patches).
Yes.
> 05 -> 06 backend core.
> 07 switches the console to the new backend core.
> 08 xenfb.c -> xen_framebuffer.c rename.
> 09 switch framebuffer to new backend core.
Thanks for the explanation.
> 05 + 06 alone are not useful as nobody uses the new backend core then.
> Merging 07 too gives at least one user. 08+09 going in gives a second
> user. They are a nice cleanup and certainly make sense for
> qemu-xen-unstable.
That looks like I'll want to take 05-07 and 09. As previously
discussed, I don't intend to take 08, at least at this stage, and I
would very strongly prefer that 08 didn't go upstream.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home