WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: FC Transport layer in xen

Hi Tej-san Mark-san and all,

Unfortunately, the pvSCSI driver for Xen 3.3 does not support FC
transport layer functionality. I consider that at least new export 
mode, which exports whole physical SCSI tree under a HBA to guest 
domain, is needed. (FC transport functionality assumes physical 
topology, I think.)

Best regards,


On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:07:25 +0530
Tej <bewith.tej@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Williamson
> <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Actually, the PVSCSI *was* mentioned in the 3.3 release announcement so I
> > think you should find it there...
> 
> yaa i was looking at 3.3 release notes, but i couldn't relate PVSCSCI to it
> thanks for this pointers
> 
> >
> > The header file seems not to have made its way into xen/include/public/io/
> > along with the other front/back interface definitions.  It is in the 
> > XenLinux
> > copy of that directory, though, which I hadn't checked.
> >
> > 3.3 is probably worth looking at, then ;-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mark
> >
> > On Saturday 23 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
> >>
> >> <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> >> >> Hi All
> >> >>
> >> >> As i was referring to the following link
> >> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
> >> >>
> >> >> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
> >> >> Is it still in review?
> >> >
> >> > I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly recently so
> >> > presumably it's still being worked on.  It doesn't look like it's made it
> >> > into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
> >> >
> >> >> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
> >> >
> >> > If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably patch
> >> > the code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging in
> >> > places if the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches
> >> > expect...
> >> >
> >> > You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible -
> >> > I'm sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list post
> >> > that you found.
> >>
> >> thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.
> >>
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Mark
> >> >
> >> >> thanks in advance for any help
> >> >>
> >> >> -TEJ
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
> >> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool 
> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


-----
Jun Kamada



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel