WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][TOOLS] ioemu: linking fix for *BSD

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][TOOLS] ioemu: linking fix for *BSD
From: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:29:46 +0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:30:43 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <18595.63794.446472.430425@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200808141059.20930.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> <18595.63794.446472.430425@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7
On Thursday 14 August 2008 11:21:54 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Christoph Egger writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH][TOOLS] ioemu: linking fix for 
*BSD"):
> > Attached patch tells the linker where to find
> >         libxenctrl.so.3.2, libxenguest.so.3.2 and libxenstore.so.3.0
> > when launching qemu-dm.
>
> I'm confused as to why this is necessary.

ldd qemu-dm  shows this:

        libxenctrl.so.3.2 => not found
        libxenguest.so.3.2 => not found
        libxenstore.so.3.0 => not found

and launching qemu-dm fails with not finding these three libs.

> > -   $(CC) $(VL_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $^ $(LIBS) $(SDL_LIBS) $(COCOA_LIBS)
> > $(VL_LIBS) +        $(CC) $(VL_LDFLAGS) -Wl,-rpath,$(LIBDIR_x86_64) -o $@ $^
> > $(LIBS) $(SDL_LIBS) $(COCOA_LIBS) $(VL_LIBS)
>
> Surely LIBDIR_x86_64, ie /usr/lib64, should be on the linker path
> already ?  Also I think this is wrong on all 32-bit builds, surely.

And $(LIBDIR) is wrong for 64-bit builds on Linux.  On *BSD, it doesn't matter
if LIBDIR or LIBDIR_x86_64 is used.


-- 
AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany
Operating System Research Center

Legal Information:
AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
Sitz (Geschäftsanschrift):
   Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Deutschland
Registergericht Dresden: HRA 4896
vertretungsberechtigter Komplementär:
   AMD Saxony LLC (Sitz Wilmington, Delaware, USA)
Geschäftsführer der AMD Saxony LLC:
   Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel