WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:12:21 +0200
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Tweedie <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:12:58 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <48691524.5010806@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080626105722.GA12640@xxxxxxx> <20080626105818.GA13805@xxxxxxx> <4863A8E6.1010807@xxxxxxxx> <20080627160333.GA27072@xxxxxxx> <486539A3.3030102@xxxxxxxx> <20080629084318.GA28815@xxxxxxx> <48684CD4.7040403@xxxxxxxx> <20080630082135.GA22844@xxxxxxx> <20080630092209.GA29815@xxxxxxx> <48691524.5010806@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> config and full log can be found at:
>>
>>  http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Mon_Jun_30_11_11_51_CEST_2008.bad
>>   
>
> That config doesn't build for me.  When I put it in place and do "make 
> oldconfig" it still asks for lots of config options (which I just set 
> to default).  But when I build it fails with:

try 'make ARCH=i386 oldconfig' - does it work better that way?

> include2/asm/page_64.h:46:2: error: #error "CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START must be a 
> multiple of 2MB"
> make[3]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>
> I can fix that, of course, but it doesn't give me confidence I'm 
> testing what you are...

the problem there is that the 32-bit config has:

CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START=0x100000

which the 64-bit make oldconfig picked up, but that start address is not 
valid on 64-bit.

        Ingo

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>