WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-writ

To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] mm+paravirt+xen: add pte read-modify-write abstraction
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 21:44:25 +0100
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 24 May 2008 13:45:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805241022210.3081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <patchbomb.1211552448@localhost> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805231133130.3081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48372C2F.1090704@xxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805241022210.3081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Well, you could use it to update the page and protection bits while preserving
the AD bits, but I don't think that's very useful.

It's not that it's not "very useful" - it's that it would be TOTALLY WRONG.

Sorry, I was using ironic understatement. I meant "...while preserving the AD bits, but I think that would be totally fucking stupid".

   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel