|   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newiss 
| It's weird that we have not reproduced the issue here. I always use VNC to a
remote host, and I see no colour issues with a newly-installed WinXP SP2
guest. Is this difference in observed behaviour explainable?
 -- Keir
On 28/3/08 10:01, "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi, Samuel,
>     Recently, I look into the bug 1180: Hvm windows guest shows abnormal
> color. I find that, if we use X window to boot a windows guest, the color is
> correct; and if we use vnc viewer to connect to the host and boot a windows
> guest, the color is abnormal. This issue comes from Xen C/S 17171.
> 
> BTW, I set sdl=1 and vnc=0 in my configuration file. If set sdl=0 and vnc=1 in
> configuration file, both color from vnc viewer or X window are correct.
> 
> Best regards,
> -- Dongxiao
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Samuel Thibault
> Sent: 2008年3月24日 18:15
> To: Li, Haicheng
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no
> newissue
> 
> Li, Haicheng, le Mon 24 Mar 2008 17:46:29 +0800, a écrit :
>> 2. Hvm windows guest shows abnormal color.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1180
> 
> Oh, it is really still present?  I can't reproduce it any more
> 
>> 5. HVM domain performance would downgrade, after doing save/restore.
>> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1143
> 
> That also should have been fixed
> 
> Thanks for testing!
> Samuel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	new issue, Keir Fraser[Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no new	issue, Li, Haicheng
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no new	issue, Samuel Thibault
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue, Li, Haicheng
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue, Xu, Dongxiao
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue,
Keir Fraser <=
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue, Stefano Stabellini
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue, Xu, Dongxiao
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue, Stefano Stabellini
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue, Keir Fraser
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue, Xu, Dongxiao
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- no	newissue, Keir Fraser
 |  |  |