WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen hypervisor hangs on booting against c/s 16925

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen hypervisor hangs on booting against c/s 16925
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:55:47 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 02:56:25 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <479F13E4.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AchiZYCrvxLEg85YEdyyYwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Xen hypervisor hangs on booting against c/s 16925
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618
Does Linux have a permanent mapping, indeed a superpage mapping, of the
bottom megabyte? I think it does. The fact that this persists in the Linux
kernel, which is thoroughly tested on many many platforms, I think indicates
we are over-worrying about mappings of the bottom megabyte.

 -- Keir

On 29/1/08 10:54, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> .. which is bad, and should probably be changed, too. Jan
> 
>>>> Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 29.01.08 11:40 >>>
> Also, bear in mind that dom0 permanently has a WB mapping of the whole
> bottom megabyte.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> On 29/1/08 10:36, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> How about we just map the whole megabyte UC- at start of day? We rarely touch
>> anything down there and when we do it'll mostly be BIOS tables (hence in ROM
>> and hence not marked as RAM in e820 and hence your approach would have them
>> also marked UC-). That at least has the tangible benefit of removing a few
>> lines of (assembly) code. :-)
>> 
>>  -- Keir
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel