WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/

To: Bill Burns <bburns@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:08:39 +0000
Cc: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Carb, Brian A" <Brian.Carb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:09:42 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <479DE086.9020206@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Achht0e0hiF3WM2qEdyKMQAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618
On 28/1/08 14:02, "Bill Burns" <bburns@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ok, some progress. Background is that 3.1.2 (and 3.1.3 at least
> as it was a wek or two ago) fails to boot on a 64 CPU es7000 with
> over 112GB of memory. This is with both HV & dom0 being x86_64.
> The symptom is that the dom0 kernel gets time went backwards
> error during init.
> 
> The patch at which this first fails is 15137, which is the patch
> that introduces using the ACPI PM timer as the clock
> source. If I include the next patch (that allows for clock
> selection) and choose pit as clock source the system boots
> fine. Without the arg the ACPI timer is used and I get the hang.

The obvious question then is what happens to the ACPI PM timer when dom0
gets more than 112GB of memory. Perhaps it's worth adding some tracing to
Xen and see whether e.g., the platform timer stops running?

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>