WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] SCSI passthrough using /dev/sgX

Hi.

We are not developing SCSI of Windows. 
We have no plan to depvelop Windows SCSI pass-through currently.

Our SCSI pass-through doesn't use SCSI Generic. 

Does using SCSI Generic in backend mean user-space access ?




Mark Williamson san wrote:----------------------
Sent:    Tue, 4 Dec 2007 02:12:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] SCSI passthrough using /dev/sgX

> There are some folks (from Fujitsu?  I think?) who are working on 
> front/back-based SCSI passthrough.  Patches have been submitted several times 
> but not merged yet.  They'll be in the list archives...
> 
> I don't think they've done a Windows frontend though ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark
> 
> On Tuesday 04 December 2007, James Harper wrote:
> > > Is anyone working on SCSI passthrough using the 'SCSI Generic' support
> > > under Linux, eg /dev/sgX? This is how VMWare allows a VM to use SCSI
> > > devices.
> >
> > I assume that the lack of response means 'no'.
> >
> > I've just been having a look through the documentation for 'SCSI
> > Generic' under Linux, and it looks pretty straightforward...
> >
> > It could be done much like the existing blkdev interface, the 'input'
> > half of the sg_io_hdr (or something like it), would go on the ring as
> > the request, and the 'output' half, would come back on the ring as the
> > response. Buffers would be passed like the block interface does now,
> > although I'd probably prefer that we allow single byte aligned rather
> > than 512 byte aligned buffers as the block device currently does, as
> > Windows tends to use the former a bit. I'm not sure if any other IOCTL's
> > apart from SG_IO (which is the equivalent of a write + read operation
> > anyway) would be required as part of normal IO, they could just be
> > performed at initialisation and written to xenstore.
> >
> > This would allow single SCSI devices or pretty much any type to be
> > exported to domains.
> >
> > I'm interested in writing the Linux backend, and the Windows front end
> > as I'm pretty desperate for tape drive passthrough...
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat?  And no pedals!
> Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
> Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
> Mark: My wheel has a wheel!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel