| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xen NUMA strategy
> Ian Pratt wrote: [Tue Sep 18 2007, 04:43:24AM EDT]
> > The way I see it, in most situations it will not make sense for
guests
> > to span NUMA nodes: you'll have a number of guests with relatively
small
> > numbers of vCPUs, and it probably makes sense to allow the guests to
be
> > pinned to nodes. What we have in Xen today works pretty well for
this
> > case, [snip]
>
> One part that doesn't work well presently is memory locality. A guest
> can be pinned to a CPU but its allocated memory might be on a distant
> node...
If the guest's VCPUs were pinned to a particular node (or nodes) at the
time the domain was created or additional memory was allocated to it,
then the memory *will* be allocated from the right node(s). If you have
a domain CPU mask that covers multiple nodes, memory will be 'striped'
across the nodes.
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home