WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] Virtio draft III: example ne

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] Virtio draft III: example net driver
From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:54:33 -0400
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <cborntra@xxxxxxxxxx>, Latchesar Ionkov <lionkov@xxxxxxxx>, Suzanne McIntosh <skranjac@xxxxxxxxxx>, Brian King <brking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:51:53 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070625193304.GB25736@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1181217762.14054.192.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1181999552.6237.255.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1181999669.6237.257.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1181999825.6237.260.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <467FDEAD.4030204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070625193304.GB25736@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615)
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 10:26:37AM -0500, Brian King wrote:
1. The add_inbuf interface passes an sg list. This causes problems for
   ibmveth since its rx buffers cannot be scatterlists.

I'm probably missing something. What is wrong with a scatterlist of length 1?

2. The user of this API does not have access to the sk_buf. This causes
   issues for ibmveth since it needs to reserve the first 8 bytes of the
   rx buffer for use by the firmware. It currently uses skb_reserve to do this.

Would it be simpler to just pass an sk_buf rather than the scatterlist
on these interfaces for virtio_net users?

It probably should pass the sk_buff.

But virtio is a generic layer that is useful for more than just networking.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>