WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] [Net] Support accelerated network plugin mod

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] [Net] Support accelerated network plugin modules
From: Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:11:31 +0200
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:51:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C29835DB.931B%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C29835DB.931B%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.6
On Friday 15 June 2007 13:26:03 Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 15/6/07 11:46, "Kieran Mansley" <kmansley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This is a repost of some earlier patches to the xen-devel mailing list,
> > with a number of changes thanks to some useful suggestions from others.
> 
> The coding style needs fixing in various ways.
> 
> Hard tabs need to be used, no spaces inside brackets, but should include
> spaces between if/while/for and bracket, and bracket and brace:
>     if (foo) {
> Not
>     if( foo ){
>     if(foo ) {
> Or various other possibilities.
> 
> No use of the following please:
> If (foo) return 1; else return 0;
> Is clearer as:
> Return foo;

But it's not the same.
        return !!foo;
would be the same. And yes, it does matter:

int x(void)
{
        unsigned long long v = 0xFF0000000000ULL;
        /*foo*/
        return v;
}

-- 
Greetings Michael.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel