WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] virtio infrastructure

To: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/3] virtio infrastructure
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:17:40 +1000
Cc: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <cborntra@xxxxxxxxxx>, Suzanne McIntosh <skranjac@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:16:11 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4663F6AC.7070100@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1180613947.11133.58.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46610E8D.10706@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1180777836.9228.44.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46625192.5020108@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1180866540.17442.74.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4662A86A.7010706@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1180914836.17442.104.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4663E18D.4030007@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1180955964.25878.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4663F6AC.7070100@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:25:32PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> 
> OT: Does that hold for bonded interfaces too?

Yes.  By default traffic to the same destination MAC always stick to
one interface.  You could select a layer3+4 hashing policy but even
that guarantees a single flow will stick to one physical interface
unless it contains IP fragments which should never happen for TCP.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel