WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] PV drivers for HVM guest

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] PV drivers for HVM guest
From: "Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:12:04 -0600
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:10:47 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In platform_pci.c we register the IRQ that the hypervisor should use to notify 
the guest in response to event channel notifications.  In cases where the 
mapping between irq and vectors are not one to one, I am not sure how this can 
work. For instance, on a  RHEL 4 installation (with acpi turned on)  I am 
looking at, the irq assigned to the platform-pci device is 185! Consequently 
the set_callback_irq() fails since the number passed down exceeds the number of 
pins being emulated. Any insight will be greatly appreciated.

Regards,

K. Y



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>