WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] incompatible prototypes

To: PUCCETTI Armand <armand.puccetti@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] incompatible prototypes
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:09:05 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:07:50 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <46321BFC.9090804@xxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AceI5mC5n5ECCPTZEduDOgAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] incompatible prototypes
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214


On 27/4/07 16:51, "PUCCETTI Armand" <armand.puccetti@xxxxxx> wrote:

> You're quite right on the first point. However the incompatible prototypes
> might lead to errors if some of these functions are called.

__attribute__((regparm(0))) is the default for i386 anyway. Really
asmlinkage should define to nothing for all x86 architectures, and we can
just kill off all use of asmlinkage under arch/x86.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>