RE: [Xen-devel] Is unmodified_drivers broken?

On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 18:27 -0400, Subrahmanian, Raj wrote:
> I discovered that the following directories need to be deleted/renamed.
> 
> /usr/src/linux/include/xen
> /usr/src/linux/incude/asm-i386/mach-xen
> 
> And then, run mkbuildtree and do make as in the README file, and I am
> good to go.

Excellent.

> So, here's my question : Even though I am on a x86_64 hvm, why does it
> include and compile code from asm-i386? Renaming (or not renaming the)
> asm-x86_64/mach-xen seems to have absolutely no effect.

Some of the x86_64 headers do #include <asm-i386/...> since the two
platforms share some code.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Is unmodified_drivers broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj Re: [Xen-devel] Is unmodified_drivers broken?, Ian Campbell RE: [Xen-devel] Is unmodified_drivers broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj RE: [Xen-devel] Is unmodified_drivers broken?, Ian Campbell <=

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Enable VMX MSR bitmap support, Li, Xin B

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Enable VMX MSR bitmap support, Keir Fraser

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] Is unmodified_drivers broken?, Subrahmanian, Raj

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] vmx status report against 14631 - No new issue, 4 old issues, Zhao, Yunfeng

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]