 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement
| To: | "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:47:21 +0000 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 16 Mar 2007 06:45:31 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Btw., another question that made me wonder already when doing the original patch: why is it that x86-64 properly uses locking for mm_pin_all(), yet i386 doesn't need to? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement, Jan Beulich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [HVM] Patches to make HVM capable of running OS/2., Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement, Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: Re: struct page field arrangement, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
