Re: [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix

To:	Jambunathan K <jambunathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix
From:	Chris <hap10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:43:26 -0500
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sanjeev@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 08 Mar 2007 12:42:53 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<45F06667.8080705@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<45F06667.8080705@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Macintosh/20070221)

Jambunathan K wrote:
> Shouldn't pciback_field_is_dup(dev, field->offset) be scoped to include
> the base_offset as well?

I think you're right.  Let me see what needs to be changed to accomplish
the intended behavior.

Thanks,
Chris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel][Xense-devel][PATCH][XSM][1/4] Xen Security Modules Patch, George S. Coker, II

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [patch 0/6] domain builder patches, Hollis Blanchard

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Re: pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix, Jambunathan K

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix, Keir Fraser

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix