RE: [Xen-devel] Sles9.3 HVM guest block

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] Sles9.3 HVM guest block
From:	"Woller, Thomas" <thomas.woller@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:43:00 -0600
Cc:	"Wilson, Stephen" <Stephen.Wilson@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 01 Mar 2007 09:42:25 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C2027477.26C0%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcdVEJN9twCKDJwESkePMcO9nEpUbAA9OWc7AYjBonA=
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Sles9.3 HVM guest block

> Update: changeset 14039:87f31a0db841 in xen-unstable may well 
> fix this problem. It fixes a going-to-sleep race when 
> executing HLT in an HVM guest.
We have had issues with HVM guests last week or 2 (even with c/s 14039),
but recent testing shows that c/s 14138 passes our regression for the
SLES9.3 and SUSE10 32b HVM guests.  So, looks like c/s 14039 did fix the
hpet guest block issue we were experiencing.
tom



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Sles9.3 HVM guest block