WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 16/21] Xen-paravirt: Add code into head.S to hand

To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 16/21] Xen-paravirt: Add code into head.S to handle being booted by Xen
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:23:40 -0800
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:22:56 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <m1zm7gmacy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070213221729.772002682@xxxxxxxx> <20070213221830.707197267@xxxxxxxx> <20070213235424.GA1908@xxxxxx> <45D35ABE.1050504@xxxxxxxx> <m1zm7gpkjh.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45D3740A.4080600@xxxxxxxx> <m17iukphxr.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45D3A5A4.7080804@xxxxxxxx> <m1ire4nqqy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45D3BCC6.9020807@xxxxxxxx> <m1zm7gmacy.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212)
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I'm pretty certain we explicitly drop the weird GNU note that
> is automatically generated by gcc and specifies something informational.
>   
But that's something else again, since it appears as a PT_GNU_STACK phdr.

> I don't think anything we are doing is wrong but ld gets confused easily
> in the corner cases.  I'm modestly surprised we didn't have to mark our
> .note.xxx scions as ".section .note.xxx @note"  or whatever the proper
> gas syntax is.

I did try that, and it didn't make a difference.  The manual says that
the output section type follows the input section type, so I agree its a
bit surprising we ever get a SHT_NOTE out of it without the @note stuff.

    J


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>