Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Use string bound functions (take #2)

On Monday 29 January 2007 15:37, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> I notice these aren't checking for buffer truncation.  Might be worth
> putting checks for this in places where it matters and not silently
> truncate the string (e.g. the domain builder).

Yeah. I think, this should be done in another patch. Most important is,
that strlcpy() is used rather strncpy().

Christoph

>
> -anil
>
> On 29 Jan 2007, at 14:25, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > <xen_stringbound.diff>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Use string bound functions (take #2), Christoph Egger Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Use string bound functions (take #2), Anil Madhavapeddy Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Use string bound functions (take #2), Christoph Egger <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: changeset 13403 ..., Gerd Hoffmann

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] How to allocate contiguous RAM in pv guests, Uli

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Use string bound functions (take #2), Anil Madhavapeddy

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] Use string bound functions (take #2), Christoph Egger

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]