WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re: compat BUG

To: "Xen devel list" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Re: compat BUG
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:44:18 +0000
Cc: Emmanuel Ackaouy <ack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:42:28 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <45A4BABF.1090603@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <45A4BABF.1090603@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Just got this one, see attached log ...

Below patch should fix it - need to take multicall context into consideration 
when
determining the continuation arguments for mmuext ops.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

Index: 2007-01-08/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
===================================================================
--- 2007-01-08.orig/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c     2006-12-15 
15:32:58.000000000 +0100
+++ 2007-01-08/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c  2007-01-10 16:06:16.000000000 
+0100
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
 
 #include <xen/event.h>
+#include <xen/multicall.h>
 #include <compat/memory.h>
 #include <compat/xen.h>
 
@@ -289,20 +290,27 @@ int compat_mmuext_op(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(mm
             if ( err == __HYPERVISOR_mmuext_op )
             {
                 struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs();
-                unsigned int left = regs->ecx & ~MMU_UPDATE_PREEMPTED;
+                struct mc_state *mcs = &this_cpu(mc_state);
+                unsigned int arg1 = !test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags)
+                                    ? regs->ecx
+                                    : mcs->call.args[1];
+                unsigned int left = arg1 & ~MMU_UPDATE_PREEMPTED;
 
-                BUG_ON(!(regs->ecx & MMU_UPDATE_PREEMPTED));
+                BUG_ON(left == arg1);
                 BUG_ON(left > count);
                 guest_handle_add_offset(nat_ops, count - left);
                 BUG_ON(left + i < count);
                 guest_handle_add_offset(cmp_uops, (signed int)(count - left - 
i));
                 left = 1;
                 BUG_ON(!hypercall_xlat_continuation(&left, 0x01, nat_ops, 
cmp_uops));
-                BUG_ON(left != regs->ecx);
-                regs->ecx += count - i;
+                BUG_ON(left != arg1);
+                if (!test_bit(_MCSF_in_multicall, &mcs->flags))
+                    regs->_ecx += count - i;
+                else
+                    mcs->compat_call.args[1] += count - i;
             }
             else
-                BUG_ON(rc > 0);
+                BUG_ON(err > 0);
             rc = err;
         }
 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>