WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Change spec of callback IRQ for PV-on-HVM onIA64

To: <Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Change spec of callback IRQ for PV-on-HVM onIA64
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:54:32 +0800
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:54:55 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AccNQQgOf1hr1sOCQMSeaE7aZ6BMxgAATA3A
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Change spec of callback IRQ for PV-on-HVM onIA64
>From: Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: 2006年11月21日 15:45
>You (Doi.Tsunehisa) said:
>>> Maybe I'm missing something and you can help me understand. :-)
>>> Whatever the value is mangled in pdev->irq, you should always
>>> keep following two instances same:
>>>     if ((ret = request_irq(pdev->irq, evtchn_interrupt, SA_SHIRQ,...
>>> and
>>>     if ((ret = set_callback_irq(pdev->irq)))
>>
>>   In x86-linux, two instances are same. But in IA64-linux, previous
>one
>> is a external interrupt vector for xen-platform interruption. Although
>> latter one is a hardware IRQ id. Both values are not same in IA64-linux.
>
>  Sorry.. This description is situation with my patch.
>--

So we have agreement on this requirement, though not the patch. :-)

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel