Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer

Atsushi SAKAI <sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hello, Markus
>
>  I want to test PV patch but current patch does not work.
> (as Steven Smith suggested, for example xenfb.h xenkbd.h location is not 
> correct)
> Could you give me a working version patch?
>
> Thanks
> Atsushi SAKAI

My frontend patch is relative to the Linux tree, not the Xen tree, and
not the *sparse* Linux tree within the Xen tree.

The guardians of the source tree assure me they greatly benefit from
having a sparse tree there.  Good for them[*]!  I don't.  It's a pain
in the neck for me.  By refusing to touch the sparse tree, I shift a
good part of my pain to those who enjoy the benefits.  I consider that
fair.

To try my patch, let Xen create an ordinary source tree, then patch
that.  I do test that it applies there before submitting.

If you'd rather sparsify it, perhaps a knowledgeable user of the
sparse tree can help you.

[*] No irony intended, honest, officer.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] Building unmodified_drivers fails in unstable x64XEN, Nowatzki, Thomas L

Next by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] Reserve MMIO a0000-c0000 in ACPI dsdt, Li, Xin B

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Atsushi SAKAI

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PV framebuffer, Atsushi SAKAI

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]