WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64 machine_to_phys vs NX bit

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Byrne <john.l.byrne@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] x86-64 machine_to_phys vs NX bit
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:17:14 +0000
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:17:46 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <455986C5.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AccHxUpPiN+0vXO4EduTwgANk04WTA==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] x86-64 machine_to_phys vs NX bit
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620
On 14/11/06 8:05 am, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Here's the new patch.
> 
> One more comment: Any reason __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT etc. can't be
> in maddr.h, where they would more logically belong?

Those definitions already exist in x86/64's page.h, and maddr.h currently
contains only Xen-specific definitions. So it probably makes sense to leave
them in page.h on both architecture I think.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel