WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] shorten the x86_64 boot setup GDT to what th

To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] shorten the x86_64 boot setup GDT to what the comment says
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:31:44 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 07:34:18 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <455357C9.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0611082144410.17812@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200611091413.21415.ak@xxxxxxx> <455357C9.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
On Thursday 09 November 2006 16:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> 09.11.06 14:13 >>>
> >>
> >> Stephen Tweedie has written up a patch to fix the Xen side and will be
> >> submitting that to those folks. But that doesn't excuse the GDT limit
> >> being a magnitude too big.
> >
> >Added thanks
>
> Once at this - why not set it to the *correct* value, just like i386 does,
> and update the comment at once? Namely, why would you expect to
> never run into the original problem again if there are still possible
> selectors pointing into invalid, yet within limits parts of the GDT?

Ok I will use an offset.

-Andi

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel