WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Direct I/O to domU seeing a 30% performance hit

To: "John Byrne" <john.l.byrne@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Direct I/O to domU seeing a 30% performance hit
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 17:20:00 -0000
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Emmanuel Ackaouy <ack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 09:20:52 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <8A87A9A84C201449A0C56B728ACF491E01F76D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4550B802.8030505@xxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AccCjDsvLVVRPnJST8CKb1682qtJwgAAyFaQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Direct I/O to domU seeing a 30% performance hit
> Both dom0 and the domU are SLES 10, so I don't know why the "idle"
> performance of the two should be different. The obvious asymmetry is
the
> disk. Since the disk isn't direct, any disk I/O by the domU would
> certainly impact dom0, but I don't think there should be much, if any.
I
> did run a dom0 test with the domU started, but idle and there was no
> real change to dom0's numbers.
> 
> What's the best way to gather information about what is going on with
> the domains without perturbing them? (Or, at least, perturbing
everyone
> equally.)
> 
> As to the test, I am running netperf 2.4.1 on an outside machine to
the
> dom0 and the domU. (So the doms are running the netserver portion.) I
> was originally running it in the doms to the outside machine, but when
> the bad numbers showed up I moved it to the outside machine because I
> wondered if the bad numbers were due to something happening to the
> system time in domU. The numbers is the "outside" test to domU look
worse.


It might be worth checking that there's no interrupt sharing happening.
While running the test against the domU, see how much CPU dom0 burns in
the same period using 'xm vcpu-list'.

To keep things simple, have dom0 and domU as uniprocessor guests.

Ian


> Ian Pratt wrote:
> >
> >> There have been a couple of network receive throughput
> >> performance regressions to domUs over time that were
> >> subsequently fixed. I think one may have crept in to 3.0.3.
> >
> > The report was (I believe) with a NIC directly assigned to the domU,
so
> > not using netfront/back at all.
> >
> > John: please can you give more details on your config.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >> Are you seeing any dropped packets on the vif associated with
> >> your domU in your dom0? If so, propagating changeset
> >> 11861 from unstable may help:
> >>
> >> changeset:   11861:637eace6d5c6
> >> user:        kfraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> date:        Mon Oct 23 11:20:37 2006 +0100
> >> summary:     [NET] back: Fix packet queuing so that packets
> >> are drained if the
> >>
> >>
> >> In the past, we also had receive throughput issues to domUs
> >> that were due to socket buffer size logic but those were
> >> fixed a while ago.
> >>
> >> Can you send netstat -i output from dom0?
> >>
> >> Emmanuel.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:55:17PM -0800, John Byrne wrote:
> >>> I was asked to test direct I/O to a PV domU. Since, I had a system
> >>> with two NICs, I gave one to a domU and one dom0. (Each is
> >> running the
> >>> same
> >>> kernel: xen 3.0.3 x86_64.)
> >>>
> >>> I'm running netperf from an outside system to the domU and
> >> dom0 and I
> >>> am seeing 30% less throughput for the domU vs dom0.
> >>>
> >>> Is this to be expected? If so, why? If not, does anyone
> >> have a guess
> >>> as to what I might be doing wrong or what the issue might be?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> John Byrne
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>