WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][RFC] New command: xm pcpu-list

On Friday 22 September 2006 07:56, Ian Pratt wrote:
<snip>
>
> The example you give below is a truly bizarre enumeration of CPUs. X86
> does effectively enumerates [nodes][sockets][cores][threads] (in C
> terminology), hence on a hyperthreaded system PCPU 0 and 1 are in the
> same core.
>

<snip>

Not all X86 machines work this way.  For Linux, it depends on the order in 
which the processors appear in the SRAT table (or MP table?), as I recall, 
and I imagine the same is true for Xen.   Most system manufacturers write the 
BIOS so that the processor ordering is as you describe.   That is logical 
processors 0 and 1 are both on socket 0, 2 and 3 are on socket 1, etc.   
However, we have encountered BIOS's for AMD procesors which this numbering is 
done with logical 0 and 1 being core 0 on socket 0 and 1, respectively.    
The numbering continues this way, until all sockets have been enumerated, 
then (in a 4-socket system), logical processor 4 is core 1 on socket 0, 5 is 
core 1 on socket 1, etc.   The apparent rationale for this is that IF you 
decide to boot the system with only 4 processors, then you get one active 
core on each socket.

(Here logical processor number is the number that smp_processor_id() returns.)

<snip>
-- 
Ray Bryant
AMD Performance Labs                   Austin, Tx
512-602-0038 (o)                 512-507-7807 (c)



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>