|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary 
| To: | Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Re: A proposal - binary |  
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |  
| Date: | Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:52:36 +0200 |  
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jack Lo <jlo@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx,	pazke@xxxxxxxxx |  
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 04 Aug 2006 15:53:12 -0700 |  
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| In-reply-to: | <44D3CCA1.1040503@xxxxxxxxxx> |  
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |  
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |  
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |  
| References: | <44D1CC7D.4010600@xxxxxxxxxx> <200608050001.52535.ak@xxxxxxx>	<44D3CCA1.1040503@xxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.3 |  
| 
> For privileged domains that have hardware privileges and need to send 
> IPIs or something it might make sense. 
Any SMP guest needs IPI support of some sort.
But it is hopefully independent of subarchitectures in the paravirtualized
case.
> doesn't stop Linux from using the provided primitives in any way is 
> sees fit.  So it doesn't top evolution in that sense.  What it does stop 
> is having the Linux hypervisor interface grow antlers and have new 
> hooves grafted onto it.  What it sorely needed in the interface is a way 
> to probe 
That's the direction the interface is evolving I think (see multiple
entry point discussion) 
> and detect optional features that allow it to grow independent 
> of one particular hypervisor vendor.
Ok maybe not with options and subsets so far, but one has to
start somewhere.
-Andi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |