WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 32/33] Add the Xen virtual network device dri

To: shemminger@xxxxxxxx (Stephen Hemminger)
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 32/33] Add the Xen virtual network device driver.
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:55:13 +1000
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxx, zach@xxxxxxxxxx, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:56:12 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20060718114430.73985431@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Core
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.17-rc4 (i686))
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> diff -r eadc12b20f35 drivers/xen/netfront/netfront.c
>> --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/netfront/netfront.c Fri Jun 09 15:03:12 2006 -0400
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1584 @@
> 
>> +static inline void init_skb_shinfo(struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +{
>> +     atomic_set(&(skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref), 1);
>> +     skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags = 0;
>> +     skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = NULL;
>> +}
> 
> Shouldn't this move to skbuff.h?

If and when my dom0=>domU GSO patches are applied, this will simply
disappear.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>