This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


[Xen-devel] Re: [1/4] [NET] back: Fix maximum fragment check

On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 09:24:13AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> I'm uncomfortable with this, even though it makes things a little 
> easier now. For sanity I want to see netfront/netback explicitly grok 
> flags rather than dumbly pass them through. I'd prefer uint8_t protocol 
> and uint8_t flags. Former is a protocol enumeration; latter is unused 
> now but we can add ECN and so on later. By the way: will we need 


> netback to advertise support for the ECN flag? I'm not sure exactly 
> what it will mean, and whether it can just be ignored by netbacks that 
> don't support it?

If netback does not advertise the flag then netfront will perform
segmentation before passing TCP packets with CWR set through.

Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Xen-devel mailing list