Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-mi

To:	"Nivedita Singhvi" <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem
From:	"Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 22 May 2006 13:25:36 -0600
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Aravindh Puthiyaparambil <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Mon, 22 May 2006 12:26:08 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4471BC98.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx><4471BC98.E57C.0030
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<EF8D308BE33AF54D8934DF26520252D30484BDB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3fff45e9026898258afc2445c25d85c9@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4471B47A.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <4a7c24c6870aa1e8619e99a32a90c8c6@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4471BC98.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx><4471BC98.E57C.0030
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Under what circumstances was that the case, do you
> know? It doesn't seem like the normal default case,
> we've certainly not run into that one...
> 
> thanks,
> Nivedita

Unfortunately I don't have the details currently. I will keep you
posted.

K. Y
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen- devel mailing list
> Xen- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen- devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm-test block device write verify test, Daniel Stekloff

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xm-test block device write verify test, Harry Butterworth

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem, Nivedita Singhvi

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem, Keir Fraser

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make "xm mem-set" be lowerboundondomX-min-mem