WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux: eliminate E820 tables

from [Chris Wright] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux: eliminate E820 tables
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:05:12 -0700
Cc: Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 11 May 2006 17:02:17 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4463810E.6010604@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <44635590.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <4463810E.6010604@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i 
* Anthony Liguori (aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Why do we need CONFIG_XEN guards in xen specific files?
> 
> Should setup-xen.c and e820-xen.c be built when CONFIG_XEN isn't set?

Yes, but *-xen.c is temporary.  Adding CONFIG_XEN annotations
make the diffs smaller and it's easier to keep in sync with the
corresponding file's changes.

thanks,
-chris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] xm mem-set issues, Keir Fraser
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 17/35] Segment register changes for Xen, Rusty Russell
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux: eliminate E820 tables, Anthony Liguori
Next by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux: eliminate E820 tables, Andrew D. Ball
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy