This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


[Xen-devel] RE: Question about pirq_guest_unmask

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: Question about pirq_guest_unmask
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 20:30:19 +0800
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:30:47 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZp9V0FZUN0iL4AS52OY0t1kPHi9gAABOfw
Thread-topic: Question about pirq_guest_unmask
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年4月27日 20:19
>On 27 Apr 2006, at 13:16, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> If that's the case, it's possible for one EOI issued early than
>> expected.
>> Does I miss anything important? Is it OK to change it to service
>> desired
>> pirq only?
>Yes, that needs doing. Pick a new physdevop number though. If we
>backport the patch to 3.0.2 then we'll need to keep the old scan-all
>physdevop as a fallback and for backward compatibility.
>  -- Keir

OK, I'll add one together with moving physdevop to common. :-)


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-devel] RE: Question about pirq_guest_unmask, Tian, Kevin <=