 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] apic= and {mps,acpi_madt}_oem_check
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,<linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] apic= and {mps,acpi_madt}_oem_check |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:33:26 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 12 Apr 2006 07:33:18 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Can anyone explain what the point is to allow specifying the APIC model (for i386 Linux and both i386 and x86-64 Xen) on the command line, yet overriding it unconditionally if the MPS and/or the ACPI tables indicate a special system? Shouldn't the APIC replacement be suppressed in that case? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Fix comment on how to obtain current system time, Bruce Rogers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] /etc/init.d/ overwritten, Brian Hays |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Fix comment on how to obtain current system time, Bruce Rogers |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Xen cpufreq support status: how to notify hypervisorof frequency change?, jason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
