On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 04:40:11PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 10 Apr 2006, at 03:30, Horms wrote:
> >In some cases, say for instance for some bizzare reason
> >the tree was checked out of CVS, which doens't neccessarily
> >store file permissions, mkbuildtree may not be executable.
> >I couldn't decide btween chmoding mkbuildtree, which changes
> >the tree, and running sh mkbuildtree, which assumes its a shell
> >script. I settled on the latter.
> The scripts need bash and sh may not be bash?
Would you like me to look through the scripts for bashisms,
and perhaps change sh to bash, or just go with the chmod u+x approach?
Xen-devel mailing list