 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] sedf internals question
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] sedf internals question |
| From: | Tim Freeman <tfreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:33:07 -0600 |
| Delivery-date: | Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:34:13 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
With SEDF, let us say a domain has a certain timeslice allocated to it (say, 500 units) for a certain period (say 1000). It runs for 200, then blocks. When it has become unblocked, the domain is put on the runqueue -- but say we are at the end of the period, maybe 900 units in. Even if it immediately runs for 100 units, what happens to the extra 200 units it is guaranteed? Thanks, Tim _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Xend XML-RPC Refactoring, Daniel Veillard |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] Xend XML-RPC Refactoring, Anthony Liguori |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Legal concerns: added hashtable implementation, Michael Paesold |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] mini-guest io emulation, Ian Pratt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
