| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch]: adding physdev_op to hypercall.h
Keir Fraser wrote:
On 10 Mar 2006, at 16:23, Tristan Gingold wrote:
very small patch to prepare comming soon patches on ia64.
Firstly, it belongs on the ia64-devel list and in the ia64-devel tree.
I'm beginning to split out the arch-neutral changes we've made for PPC
and intend to submit those individually to xen-devel so that each can be
discussed as usual. Then once the changes we need are in, we can then
drop in the whole xen/arch/ppc directory.
With Tristan's patch, which is to arch-neutral code, you seem to prefer
it be part of the ia64 tree which you'll then pull later. What if you
don't like some of their changes? Do you give them feedback only after
they ask you to pull?
In general I assumed that patches that affect arch-neutral code should
be submitted to xen-devel; is that not the case?
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home