This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-devel] A question about CONFIG_SMP

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] A question about CONFIG_SMP
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:31:10 +0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:31:44 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcY4XWIntXP1DwvoQX6coimLWOa+CgABmwTA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] A question about CONFIG_SMP
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年2月23日 17:47
>On 23 Feb 2006, at 08:51, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> Just a curious question, does anyone still care xen/UP? If yes, current
>> xen-unstable.hg
>> failed to build quickly after undef CONFIG_SMP since many structures
>> include types
>> defined only when CONFIG_SMP is on.
>> Just realize this issue when cleanup some IA64 code recently, where
>> CONFIG_SMP is still unstable and thus UP only.
>> Is there any benefit to have xen/UP? Reducing image size is the
>> immediate answer in my head...
>It's not supported for xen/x86 at least. Dynamically adding LOCK
>prefixes if the system turns out to be multiprocessor is the only
>optimisation I think would be worthwhile. But really
>multi-processor/core/thread is what we care about.
>  -- Keir

Yep, agree. It's just raised out in case anyone has some special/meaningful 
usage model coming. :-)


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>