Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Repost - xm lists display and formatting

[Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/17/2006
02:54:21 PM:

> Stefan
> Hi
> Thanks for the xm-text initiative.
> 
> Did you test with xm-test (the whole suite of testx) on i386 and/or
> x86_64 and/or VMX, before submitting the patches? Did they all work?
> 


Here's now the output of a testrun on x86:

REASON: (7 nics) Console didn't respond: probably
crashed!
FAIL: 13_create_multinic_pos.test
REASON: ping loopback failed for size 65507. ping eth0 failed for size
65507.
XFAIL: 02_network_local_ping_pos.test
REASON: Ping to dom0 failed for size 32767 65507.
XFAIL: 05_network_dom0_ping_pos.test
REASON: Ping failed for size 32767 65507.
XFAIL: 11_network_domU_ping_pos.test
REASON: /proc/cpuinfo says xend didn't enforce dom0_cpus (2 != 1)
FAIL: 01_enforce_dom0_cpus_basic_pos.test
REASON: xm migrate returned invalid 256 != 0
FAIL: 01_migrate_localhost_pos.test

I think none of these errors is related to the xm
changes regarding network-list or block-list.
I expect the consequences of the xm changes NOT to
influence the test results on x86_64 or VMX - other challenges might be
lurking there.

   Stefan

> Dan is right, the doc also needs work.


> 
> woody
> ==============
> On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:00 -0800, Daniel Stekloff wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 10:41 -0800, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:22:42AM -0500, Stefan Berger
wrote:
> > > 
> > > > This patch displays the network-list/block-list/vtpm-list
using the 'xm'
> > > > command. It supports the '--long' option.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Applied, thank you.
> > > 
> > > This will break xm-test.  Does anyone fancy fixing
it up?  The
> > > least-effort thing to do is change all of the calls to block-list
and
> > > network-list to become block-list --long and network-list
--long, but
> > > it would be better if we fixed the eyecatchers (where necessary)
to work
> > > with the new, formatted commands, and maybe added a few
tests for
> > > xyz-list --long as well.
> > > 
> > > And of course it would be nice to have tests for vtpm-list
> (after detecting
> > > the presence of appropriate hardware, I guess).
> > > 
> > > Any volunteers?
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Three comments:
> > 
> > 1) Changes like those introduced by this patch should be submitted
with
> > corresponding tests in xm-test. We want to continue to use xm-test
to
> > verify functionality.
> > 
> > 2) The documentation - like man pages - should be updated along
with the
> > new functionality. 
> > 
> > 3) xm-test should be used to verify patches prior to submitting
and
> > applying. 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > 
> -- 
> Sincerely,      Woody Marvel
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> Open Source Virtualization
> email: marvel@xxxxxxxxxx
> 503-578-3833   Beaverton, OR 97006
> **********************************
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel