WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again
From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:33:33 +0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:44:58 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcYtXjVxAgsXdBCHQKWabZoA4JxqYAAJ3JrA
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 9 Feb 2006, at 09:32, Xu, Anthony wrote:
> 
>> Do_softirq is invoked at the path of ia64_leave_kernel instead of
>> being invoking in function irq_exit, which is aligned with XEN/X86
>> and avoids __enter_schedule being reentered. VTIdomain can boot
>> again after applying this patch. 
>> 
>> BTW, a small bug is fixed.
>> - (p6)       br.call.sptk.many b0=deliver_pending_interrupt
>> +(pUStk)     br.call.sptk.many b0=deliver_pending_interrupt
>> Since P6 is scratch register, after returning from
>> deliver_pending_interrupt, p6 may be changed. But p6 is also used by
>> subsequent code and should not be changed.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by Anthony Xu <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Should I check in this patch instead of your earlier one (which used
> xen_irq_exit instead or irq_exit?).
> 
>   -- Keir
Keir:
        This are 2 seperate one, so please check in both if possible.
thx,eddie

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel